A Conscious Reconstruction of Postcolonial Curriculums as Cultural Practice
If you would like to engage in a conversation, please use the comment section below each post.
Disclaimer: The content of this website conveys only the ideas of the blogger (Chris Yaluma) and not the affiliated websites or names. All sources used will be cited appropriately
Colonialism may no longer
be a scourge to many African and Asian countries, yet its effects are still
palpable decades later. Many African and Asian countries still use the
educational blueprints that were introduced by their colonial masters. The
colonial curriculums and learning systems were designed to ‘civilize’ the
‘uncivilized.’ The traditions and practices of the people of colonized
countries were seen as uncivilized instead of different. This is problematic
because it treats different people, not as different, but as having abnormal
practices and beliefs that need fixing.
Since many colonial
masters were Western, European countries, many former colonies in Africa and
Asia still exhibit Western, Eurocentric curriculums in their current public
school education. Colonialism and imperialism may be over but many inhabitants
of these countries still face mental colonialism and imperialism. The empires
such as the British and the French, knew very well the powerful and lasting
impact of education. Through a systematic introduction of a European education
system, these empires were able to strip the local people of their traditions,
values, and beliefs. Africans and Asians had their own traditional life and
learning systems pre-colonial time. Education was never a foreign concept in
these regions, it is the western concept and understanding of valuable
education that was different.
I am not, by any means,
calling for a complete deconstruction of the colonial educational and
epistemological systems that exist in these regions. My goal is to shed light
on systemic factors and foreign curriculums that are contributing to the loss
of culture and identity in Africa and Asia. It is interesting to note that many
post-colonial governments have done little to include local people’s cultural
elements in post-colonial curriculums, thus continuing the myth that western
culture and knowledge is superior to non-western culture and knowledge.
Knowledge, as Sandra Harding states, “is a collective human heritage and
shouldn’t be simplistically labeled as African, Asian or European.” It is
problematic then, that factually knowledge has been extensively labeled and
presented as European (Abdi, 80).
To develop a healthy
nation, we have to produce a healthy and confident citizenry that believes in
its culture and knows that its ways of thinking, knowing, and doing is
appreciated and valued. If one’s cultural capital is undermined, it is
difficult to muster one’s confidence for creativity purposes. Therefore,
African and Asian education systems and perceptions should be responsive to
African and Asian knowledge, linguistic, and scientific needs. Classrooms in
Africa and Asia should initialize and continue re-affirming African and Asian
social and cultural capitals respectively for the well-being of the local
people (Abdi, 80).

No comments:
Post a Comment